有证据他都装没有，就为了赢官司。
Tesla withheld data, lied, and misdirected police and plaintiffs to avoid blame in Autopilot crash
下面是节选，有兴趣看全文的去搜上面标题。
Last week, a jury found Tesla partially liable for a wrongful death involving a crash on Autopilot. I explained the case in the verdict in this article and video.
But we now have access to the trial transcripts, which confirm that Tesla was extremely misleading in its attempt to place all the blame on the driver.
The company went as far as to actively withhold critical evidence that explained Autopilot’s performance around the crash.
Tesla withheld the crash-snapshot data that its own server received within minutes of the collision
Within about three minutes of the crash, the Model S uploaded a “collision snapshot”—video, CAN-bus streams, EDR data, etc.—to Tesla’s servers, the “Mothership”, and received an acknowledgement. The vehicle then deleted its local copy, resulting in Tesla being the only entity having access.
What ensued were years of battle to get Tesla to acknowledge that this collision snapshot exists and is relevant to the case.
The police repeatedly attempted to obtain the data from the collision snapshot, but Tesla led the authorities and the plaintiffs on a lengthy journey of deception and misdirection that spanned years.
Here, in chronological order, is what happened based on all the evidence in the trial transcript:
1 | 25 Apr 2019 – The crash and an instant upload Tesla pretended never happened
Within ~3 minutes of the crash, the Model S packaged sensor video, CAN-bus, EDR, and other streams into a single “snapshot_collision_airbag-deployment.tar” file and pushed it to Tesla’s server, then deleted its local copy.
We know that now, thanks to forensic evidence extracted from the onboard computer.
The plaintiffs hired Alan Moore, a mechanical engineer who specializes in accident reconstruction, to forensically recover data from the Autopilot ECU (computer).
Based on the data, Moore was able to confirm that Tesla had this “collision snapshot” all along, but “unlinked” it from the vehicle:
“That tells me within minutes of this crash Tesla had all of this data … the car received an acknowledgement … then said ‘OK, I’m done, I’m going to unlink it.’”
The plaintiffs tried to obtain this data, but Tesla told them that it didn’t exist.
Tesla’s written discovery responses were shown during the trial to prove that the company acted as if this data were not available.
The facts are:
Tesla had the data on its servers within minutes of the crash
When the police sought the data, Tesla redirected them toward other data
When the police sought Tesla’s help in extracting it from the computer, Tesla falsely claimed it was “corrupted”
Tesla invented an “auto-delete” feature that didn’t exist to try explain why it couldn’t originally find the data in the computer
When the plaintiffs asked for the data, Tesla said that it didn’t exist
Tesla only admitted to the existence of the data once presented with forensic evidence that it was created and transfered to its servers.
【 在 i925XE 的大作中提到: 】
: 车企有什么正当原因扣着详细数据一扣好几年不提供给用户么？
--
FROM 218.247.161.*